What kind of frame rates are you seeing with your configuration?
teapot.java
C++ Source |
Windows 98, 400 MHz Celeron, Internet Explorer 5.0 with JIT | ||
Windows 98, 400 MHz Celeron, Netscape Communicator 4.72 with JIT | ||
Windows 98, 400 MHz Celeron, Sun's Java 1.2 implementation. | Does not stack up very well with the other Windows implementations. Internet Explorer and Netscape (above) show better results. | |
Linux 2.2.12, 300 MHz Pentium II, Netscape Communicator 4.72 with no JIT | Hope to see this number improve! Would like to see a browser on Linux comparable to the Windows versions. | |
Linux 2.2.12, 300 MHz Pentium II, Blackdown's Java 1.2.2 with JIT | JIT (Just In Time compiler) version not yet working with this "teapot" benchmark. Still in beta. | This could work as a plug-in (or replacement) for Netscape's current Java implementation on Linux. |
Linux 2.2.12, 300 MHz Pentium II, Blackdown's Java 1.2.2 with no JIT | ||
HP-UX 11.0, 400 MHz 785/C3000, Java 1.2.2 with JIT |
Windows 98, 400 MHz Celeron, Sun's Java3D implementation based on the default OpenGL implementation (i.e. Windows shipped version). No 3D hardware acceleration. | Impressive, considering no 3D hardware support!. FYI, 10 frames/sec at 1152 x 864 resolution (which is basically full screen on most systems). | |
Linux 2.2.12, 300 MHz Pentium II, Blackdown's Java 1.2.2 with no JIT. The Jave3D implementation was based on Mesa3D. No 3D hardware acceleration. | ||
HP-UX 11.0, 400 MHz 785/C3000. Java 1.2.2 with JIT. The Jave3D implementation was based on HP-UX OpenGL with Visualize-FX4 3D hardware acceleration. |
Linux 2.2.12, 300 MHz Pentium II, Mesa3D. No 3D hardware acceleration. | ||
HP-UX 11.0, 400 MHz 785/C3000, HP-UX OpenGL with Visualize-FX4 3D hardware acceleration. | ||
HP-UX 11.0, 400 MHz 785/C3000, HP-UX OpenGL with Visualize-FXE 3D hardware acceleration. |